![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ravenJust watched "Hawk's Nightmare."
Jesus. That was disturbing.
I mean, it had its lighter moments, and no end of slashy potential was set up, what with the constant soothing and tucking-in-of and laying-blankets-over Hawkeye, but still.
Mais franchement, it was frighteningly disturbing.
[Pedar mentioned that as long as you can ask whether or not you're crazy, you're not crazy. I would agree with this, but it didn't seem to work that way for Susanna Kaysen - ie, Girl Interrupted]
Not that I didn't enjoy it. Whumping and all that.
But still. That scream...
Jesus. That was disturbing.
I mean, it had its lighter moments, and no end of slashy potential was set up, what with the constant soothing and tucking-in-of and laying-blankets-over Hawkeye, but still.
Mais franchement, it was frighteningly disturbing.
[Pedar mentioned that as long as you can ask whether or not you're crazy, you're not crazy. I would agree with this, but it didn't seem to work that way for Susanna Kaysen - ie, Girl Interrupted]
Not that I didn't enjoy it. Whumping and all that.
But still. That scream...
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
on 2003-01-22 01:33 pm (UTC)and the original argument isn't mine, it is property of Descartes. but i have to say, i did agree with it. how can you ponder existence if there is no such thing?
but, i digress.
after my professor's comment, i am unsure of .. both.