Just watched "Hawk's Nightmare."
Jesus. That was disturbing.
I mean, it had its lighter moments, and no end of slashy potential was set up, what with the constant soothing and tucking-in-of and laying-blankets-over Hawkeye, but still.
Mais franchement, it was frighteningly disturbing.
[Pedar mentioned that as long as you can ask whether or not you're crazy, you're not crazy. I would agree with this, but it didn't seem to work that way for Susanna Kaysen - ie, Girl Interrupted]
Not that I didn't enjoy it. Whumping and all that.
But still. That scream...
Jesus. That was disturbing.
I mean, it had its lighter moments, and no end of slashy potential was set up, what with the constant soothing and tucking-in-of and laying-blankets-over Hawkeye, but still.
Mais franchement, it was frighteningly disturbing.
[Pedar mentioned that as long as you can ask whether or not you're crazy, you're not crazy. I would agree with this, but it didn't seem to work that way for Susanna Kaysen - ie, Girl Interrupted]
Not that I didn't enjoy it. Whumping and all that.
But still. That scream...
no subject
on 2003-01-22 10:36 am (UTC)I think that it qualifies as my most-watched M*A*S*H episode. Early this fall, I was in a Mood, and I just watched it every night, because... I'm really weird like that.
Re:
on 2003-01-22 10:44 am (UTC)My most watched episode is Dr Pierce and Mr Hyde. It's probably one of the few things in this world that has me literally rolling around with laughter...
But yeah, today's episode. Freaked me out totally, but in a good way.
no subject
on 2003-01-22 10:56 am (UTC)I also love the set-up in the episode where B.J. plans a (fake) birthday party for Hawkeye, which later morphs into an anniversary party for B.J., and then a birthday party for a soldier. My mom watched that with me once, and she was in hysterics too. Simple minds, simple pleasures :).
no subject
on 2003-01-22 11:24 am (UTC)but my philosophy professor came up with a pretty good argument against that one yesterday, so i'm starting to doubt myself.
no subject
on 2003-01-22 12:30 pm (UTC)[Sorry, had to be said!]
no subject
on 2003-01-22 12:41 pm (UTC)I first saw that when I had no idea what was going on, who was who, anything, and me and my entire family were howling with laughter.
Haven't seen the party one, but I want to, now. Why is the first party fake? And why does it morph into other parties?
[And not simple minds, oh, no. Then we're all doomed]
no subject
on 2003-01-22 01:03 pm (UTC)Also, all throughout, Klinger is getting more and more upset, because he keeps having to change the message on the cake he's baked. Hee.
Re:
on 2003-01-22 01:09 pm (UTC)Hey, good luck for your physics. I've got to go now... get offline, revise a little, exam tomorrow! *eek*
no subject
on 2003-01-22 01:33 pm (UTC)and the original argument isn't mine, it is property of Descartes. but i have to say, i did agree with it. how can you ponder existence if there is no such thing?
but, i digress.
after my professor's comment, i am unsure of .. both.
no subject
on 2003-01-22 02:58 pm (UTC)