Sports Night 1x21, Ten Wickets
Mar. 10th, 2010 09:54 pmLet's preface this with, hey, I love Sports Night, I love it like pie, I love how it's funny, thoughtful, gentle and kind. But, okay, on the whole I could have done without this episode. And even then, only most of it. I mean, I like Dana and Natalie, Natalie and Jeremy, I like the subtly-done mass concern for Isaac. Could do without Casey being such a monumental arsehole. Like, seriously - the theme of this episode and the previous few is how he's pissed off with Dana? Because she made a decision she had every right to make, that had nothing to do with him? I don't know... I got the feeling from the narrative that you're not supposed to agree with Dana when she says, "I want so much to rip his face off right now" - but I'm seein' it.
No, but. The thing I could have totally, totally lived without is this episode being themed around one bowler getting ten wickets in a single inning in a match in New Delhi. This happens, hence the name of the episode. The joke is that no one knows that that means. Hur hur. No one can even remember where New Delhi is. Hur hur hur. Sourav Ganguly has a funny name, lol. Who even plays cricket, anyway. WILL THE LULZ EVER STOP.
...yeah.
Bah. Back to work.
No, but. The thing I could have totally, totally lived without is this episode being themed around one bowler getting ten wickets in a single inning in a match in New Delhi. This happens, hence the name of the episode. The joke is that no one knows that that means. Hur hur. No one can even remember where New Delhi is. Hur hur hur. Sourav Ganguly has a funny name, lol. Who even plays cricket, anyway. WILL THE LULZ EVER STOP.
...yeah.
Bah. Back to work.
no subject
on 2010-03-10 11:42 pm (UTC)Two nations, separated by a common language
on 2010-03-10 11:45 pm (UTC)So you just have to substitute some remark about how we call it football but use our hands. Or how hockey players think they're all macho, but they wear their weight in padding and then scoff at rugby players (this works for football too). Or how baseball is possibly the most anti-climatic sport ever invented, not to mention impossible to fully explain to someone who didn't grow up watching it.
Re: Two nations, separated by a common language
on 2010-03-10 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-03-10 11:51 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-03-10 11:58 pm (UTC)Re: Two nations, separated by a common language
on 2010-03-11 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
on 2010-03-11 12:47 am (UTC)Really? My impression has always been that fandom adores Dan, and Casey just comes along for the OTP ride, you know? I don't know that many people who love Casey on his own.
(This is kind of why, although there are moments when I definitely see the Casey/Dan subtext, I have trouble really shipping them.)
Anyway, I agree, I think Casey frequently comes off as a dick, and sometimes the narrative acknowledges it and sometimes, problematically, it doesn't. I do feel like "Ten Wickets" is one where it arguably doesn't, mainly because he gets to give Dana such an Impassioned Scold in the rundown room (right? this is the episode I'm thinking of, yeah?) And then Dana's "rip his face off" line to Natalie afterward feels a little... ha ha ha, funny violent line for the ruffled woman.
On the bright side, I think there are some things in S2 that you will really, really like. (Have you seen any of S2?) I mean, just judging from the fact that we share certain narrative kinks and those kinks are indulged TO ABUNDANCE in S2. :)
no subject
on 2010-03-11 12:56 am (UTC)That's the one, yes! It really wound me up, because, oh hey, this is the show that calls people on stuff - not the same, but I love how Isaac calls Dan on how he uses Rosa Parks as a rhetorical tool earlier in the season, and I was waiting for an analagous pay-off, and... nothing.
Well, let's see, it's nearly one in the morning, I have done NO WORK yet, I strongly suspect I will hit S2 before bed, yes. :) I am not going to ask about said narrative kinks and merely feel happy about a) omg, my narrative kinks! and b) you know me so well. :P
no subject
on 2010-03-11 01:05 am (UTC)I love how Isaac calls Dan on how he uses Rosa Parks as a rhetorical tool earlier in the season
YES. YES THIS OMG. That is such a lovely moment, particularly because it does such a good job of showing how smart, sympathetic, well-meaning people who have been making valid and convincing arguments still fall prey to that kind of rhetorical appropriation.
Also, OH IONA. I am thrilled to hear that it sounds like YOU TRULY DON'T KNOW WHAT KINKS GET HIT IN S2. I was totally spoiled for them my first time, so I will enjoy experiencing them through you. *g*
no subject
on 2010-03-11 01:13 am (UTC)no subject
on 2010-03-11 04:58 am (UTC)no subject
on 2010-03-11 11:53 am (UTC)no subject
on 2010-03-11 02:58 pm (UTC)(If I know
no subject
on 2010-03-11 02:58 pm (UTC)(Also, how did I not know you wrote SN fic? I will be checking that out forthwith...)
no subject
on 2010-03-11 03:00 pm (UTC)Re: Two nations, separated by a common language
on 2010-03-11 09:07 pm (UTC)(have I told you about my days of yore as a cricket mascot? :p)
Re: Two nations, separated by a common language
on 2010-03-11 09:17 pm (UTC)Re: Two nations, separated by a common language
on 2010-03-11 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2010-03-12 11:23 pm (UTC)