on 2009-04-06 08:29 pm (UTC)
ext_5856: (0)
I go with vor-co-si-gan, or possibly vor-kos-ig-an.

There's a brief exchange where Bujold seems to imply that "bisexual" cannot equate to "monogamous", or that a bisexual person in a relationship stops being a bisexual person, or something. But... I don't know, I get the sense that this is a case of sloppy use of language, not sloppy thinking. Because the joke is that it takes Cordelia several paragraphs to realise that the fact that someone telling her this is supposed to be an insult, and her reply is pretty smooth, all things considered - despite the odd use of terms, she goes on to tell the guy, frostily, that she didn't think she was marrying a forty-four-year-old virgin. His bisexuality is a matter of supreme indifference to her, and by extension, to the reader (tight third-person narration throughout, naturally).

I read that as the person telling Cordelia thinking that, rather than Bujold doing so.

You do know that those two books are just fanfic about An SF Series with the serial numbers filed off? [g]

(I much prefer the later books. I love Miles.)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819 202122
23242526272829
3031     

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 08:31 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios