ext_59859 ([identity profile] subservient-son.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] raven 2011-02-25 07:19 pm (UTC)

It's just that my (uneducated) take on child pornography would be that since children cannot give meaningful consent, you ban it on those grounds (of course, I suppose that would allow a position where child pornography would be illegal to produce, but legal to view, like, say, footage of people being murdered).

I'd like to read that paper some time.

Thanks, this has been enlightening.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting