ext_7599 ([identity profile] amchau.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] raven 2008-04-28 07:02 am (UTC)

The case which bothers me most in defining art (and I've never studied it, so feel free to ignore me) is where does an ordinary person's attempt become art? Their drawings probably are art of a sort, but what about photographs? Some photographs are for recording facts, and it seems like they shouldn't be art; but some photographs clearly are. At what point does something cross the line?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting